Before you file a claim, you should know who you are up against. The opponent's profile, their network, prior litigation, contradictions in their public position, and the assets actually on the table. It helps you decide the only question that matters: is the case worth pursuing, and will there be anything left to collect after a win?
Who they really are: biography, assets, behavioural patterns, prior deals, and who they already owe.
Companies, shared directors, family, business partners, conflicts of interest. The likely destinations of moved assets.
Which cases they were party to, what they lost, what they won, how they behave in court — delay tactics, settlements, appeals to the last instance.
Real estate, corporate stakes, movables, foreign-currency accounts that can actually be used at the enforcement stage.
Statements in media, social posts, interviews that contradict what the opponent says officially or under oath.
Is the case worth pursuing (pre-suit viability) and will there be anything left to collect after winning (recoverability) — a summary judgement on top of the five blocks above.
A structured PDF dossier on the opponent: a network map, an asset inventory, an analysis of prior cases, and a Recoverability Score — an estimate of how much of the award could realistically be collected. From $500, tied to the value of the case: the higher the stakes, the deeper the intel that makes sense.
We'll get in touch via your chosen channel within 24 hours. Urgent? Reach out directly — @argus_int
How we work →Briefly describe the case: plaintiff/defendant, the amount at stake, the stage (pre-suit / filed / at enforcement). We'll suggest the right report scope and whether deeper intel is worth it. No extra fields, no signup.